Wednesday 12 November 2014

Handball Ref

Another weekend has passed and more refereeing controversies have arisen. This week the big talking points have been all about hand ball in the two big televised live matches on Saturday at Anfield and Loftus Road. I watched both games as I knew there would be entertainment and plenty to talk about afterwards. Little did I know there would be three hand balls that could have had a huge bearing on the outcome of where the Premier League title will go this season.

 Let me take you back to Anfield first and discuss not one but two hand balls. Yes I can't believe it myself, I am blogging about two hand balls by Chelsea’s Gary Cahill. On both occasions referee Anthony Taylor waved away the Liverpool appeals for penalties which I thought were awful calls by the official. Cahill was clearly seen to move his body towards the ball in both incidents and they were the easiest of penalties in my opinion to give. This sort of decision is fact based and the fact was he handled the ball. It is not like a referee getting a red card decision wrong due to wrong interpretation of the law, these handballs were clear to see by everybody. Player’s reaction can also give the referee a clue and on the first one, Cahill was seen clearly on TV to hold his head as if he knew he could be in trouble. Funnily enough I thought the second penalty claim by Liverpool was even easier to give as it was a clearer cut movement of the arm towards the ball. In front of a packed screaming Kop I was astonished to see the referee wave away Steven Gerard’s appeal. As we all know the easiest thing would have been to blow for the penalty in front of the passionate Liverpool fans who sit in the famous Kop. I will be interested to see if Mr Taylor gets a game the next time we have Premiership football but as they say in the high places of power "Watch this Space ".

 Before I discuss the hand ball in the game at Loftus Road can I just say Mike Dean got the Joe Hart incident completely correct? The kick had not been taken legally so therefore the free kick was to be retaken. Anywhere else on the pitch and QPR would have been awarded a free kick. The reason behind City getting to take the kick again was because the ball had not come out of the box legally due to Joe’s double touch. The speed in which he made his mind up to have the kick retaken was impressive, the sign of a man focused and tuned in. Having said that all his good work was dramatically undone when Sergio Aguero handled the ball before he scored his first goal. There is no doubt in my mind it was hand ball and the reason Mike missed it was due to bad positioning and absolutely no help from his assistant. In fact if Mike was unable to get wide enough to see the handball his assistant should have given him a shout in his ear.

 What is more worrying about the incidents that I have discussed this week is the fact these referees are not rookies. These guys are around quite a while now and should be getting these decisions correct. In particular the hand balls at Anfield were the more disappointing as the outcome of that game could have been all so different if in my opinion the referee had awarded penalties for two of the easiest claims I have seen in a long time. Next week is an international break and if you get a chance have a look at the refereeing performances of the guys who come in from around different parts of Europe to take charge of the home nations. Take note of how less fussy they are and give decisions without been surrounded by players. Anyway until next time, keep well and enjoy your football.

On that note i'd just like to say thanks for reading and feel free to share any of your comments! If you'd like to speak with me further you can catch me on Twitter: @meiercy

Monday 10 November 2014

Loads of Fun

We are only ten games into a new season and the fun is well and truly underway for the men in the middle with the whistle. There have been quite a few decisions that have been discussed in pubs the length and breadth of the UK and Ireland not to mention the rest of the world. One such discussion has been focused around players holding their opponents at the taking of corners during the game. I would like to explain why Phil Dowd in the Manchester United v Chelsea game was correct not to award a penalty for Chelsea after the so called foul on Ivanovic.

When corners are been taken players will always jostle for position and before the ball is played into the box a lot of pushing and shoving can go on. There is actually nothing wrong with this as I have always felt it was part and parcel of the game. What I have noticed though in recent times is attackers are just running straight into their markers and this in turn is leading to all sorts of holding/Pushing/Shoving etc. Let us remember it is not an offence to stand your ground and your natural reaction as a defender is to hold your ground. If you can get your hand on a recording of the United match I would ask you to have a look at the particular incident again and don't look at Ivanovic but focus your eyes on John Terry. As the corner comes in JT runs at Chris Smalling and both are holding but in my opinion Terry was the aggressor and a free kick should have been given to United. If this had happened we would not have been talking about an incident involving the Chelsea defender Ivanovic. The point I am trying to make is the fact at what players are up to now to try and win penalties. I spoke recently with a referee in the UK and he informed me that at a pre season meeting with managers and referees that the managers had no issues with players holding in the penalty areas. The view was that it seemed to be part and parcel of the game. If the truth be known it was probably that on the  law of averages they would get a penalty sooner or later.

One other item that caught my eye was the treatment of in my opinion the best referee in the UK at present. Mark Clattenburg is top class and controls a game so well. He goes about his business on a football field with very little fuss and very rarely has a bad game. I was utterly astonished to hear recently that Mark had been dropped from the panel of referees for a weekend after he went to an Ed Sheeran concert and was involved in speaking to Neil Warnock on the phone. Mark can have no excuse after his dash to the Sheeran concert. Really he should have sorted out travel arrangements to that gig long before his match in which he got caught up in the controversy. I am sure he will have learned a lesson on that issue. The Warnock phone call to me is more of a worry though. As a referee you should never be getting phone calls from managers, it is a really really dangerous road to go down. I would love to know how Warnock got a hold of a private phone number for Mark. That would be a question I certainly would ask. Mark missed out on a couple of big games due to those blunders and they were not even related to things that happened on the park. I hope he has learned his lesson and the next time I write about him it's on him having a great performance once again in a game. Mind you I will be watching to see when he gets a game involving Crystal Palace again. Watch this space. 

On that note i'd just like to say thanks for reading and feel free to share any of your comments! If you'd like to speak with me further you can catch me on Twitter: @meiercy